We're looking for a user researcher to understand the needs of developers and designers. Is this you or someone you know? Check out the post: https://mzl.la/2IGzdXS

我们的志愿者还没有将这篇文章翻译为 中文 (简体)加入我们帮助完成翻译
您也可以阅读此文章的English (US)版。

Precedence Table

Hi. I was under the impression that it was more customary, in a precedence table, to list operators in decreasing order of precendence -- ie. the higher up in the table, the greater priority. I cite this table concerning C and C++ in Wikipedia as an example, and I'm pretty sure it's what I've always seen in textbooks... Anyone else with an opinion concerning this ? (whoops, forgot to sign that, sorry) Exaton 09:07, 25 March 2006 (PST)

I have now seen that the Operator Precedence Table in the MDC JS Core Reference *is* reversed, and that it underwent that reversal after discussion on the talk page. So, shouldn't the same thing happen here ? Happy to do the copy & pasting if people agree :-) Exaton 00:39, 28 March 2006 (PST)

I think you can reverse it; there's no point in having two tables list operators in different order. --Nickolay 13:31, 28 March 2006 (PST)
OK, been a few days now, so going ahead with that. -- Exaton 10:11, 3 April 2006 (PDT)


此页面的贡献者: Exaton, Nickolay
最后编辑者: Exaton,