Your Search Results

    Nonblocking IO In NSPR

    この記事はまだ日本語に翻訳されていません。MDN の翻訳はボランティアによって行われています。是非 MDN に登録し、私たちの力になって下さい。

    Introduction

    Previously, all I/O in the NetScape Portable Runtime (NSPR) was blocking (or synchronous). A thread invoking an io function is blocked until the io operation is finished. The blocking io model encourages the use of multiple threads as a programming model. A thread is typically created to attend to one of the simultaneous I/O operations that may potentially block.

    In the nonblocking io model, a file descriptor may be marked as nonblocking. An io function on a nonblocking file descriptor either succeeds immediately or fails immediately with <tt>PR_WOULD_BLOCK_ERROR</tt>. A single thread is sufficient to attend to multiple nonblocking file descriptors simultaneously. Typically, this central thread invokes <tt>PR_Poll()</tt> on a set of nonblocking file descriptors. (Note: <tt>PR_Poll()</tt> also works with blocking file descriptors, although it is less useful in the blocking io model.) When <tt>PR_Poll()</tt> reports that a file descriptor is ready for some io operation, the central thread invokes that io function on the file descriptor.

    Creating a Nonblocking Socket

    Only sockets can be made nonblocking. Regular files always operate in blocking mode. This is not a serious constraint as one can assume that disk I/O never blocks. Fundamentally, this constraint is due to the fact that nonblocking I/O and <tt>select()</tt> are only available to sockets on some platforms (e.g., Winsock).

    In NSPR, a new socket returned by <tt>PR_NewTCPSocket()</tt> or <tt>PR_NewUDPSocket()</tt> is always created in blocking mode. One can make the new socket nonblocking by using <tt>PR_SetSockOpt()</tt> as in the example below (error checking is omitted for clarity):


    <tt>PRFileDesc *sock;</tt>
    <tt>PRIntn optval = 1;</tt>

    <tt>sock = PR_NewTCPSocket();</tt>

    /*
    * Make the socket nonblocking
    */
     
    PR_SetSockOpt(sock, PR_SockOpt_Nonblocking, &optval, sizeof(optval));
    

    Programming Constraints

    There are some constraints due to the use of NT asynchronous I/O in the NSPR. In NSPR, blocking sockets on NT are associated with an I/O completion port. Once associated with an I/O completion port, we can't disassociate the socket from the I/O completion port. I have seen some strange problems with using a nonblocking socket associated with an I/O completion port. So the first constraint is:

    The blocking/nonblocking io mode of a new socket is committed the first time a potentially-blocking io function is invoked on the socket. Once the io mode of a socket is committed, it cannot be changed.

    The potentially-blocking io functions include <tt>PR_Connect()</tt>, <tt>PR_Accept()</tt>, <tt>PR_AcceptRead()</tt>, <tt>PR_Read()</tt>, <tt>PR_Write()</tt>, <tt>PR_Writev()</tt>, <tt>PR_Recv()</tt>, <tt>PR_Send()</tt>, <tt>PR_RecvFrom()</tt>, <tt>PR_SendTo()</tt>, and <tt>PR_TransmitFile(),</tt> and do not include <tt>PR_Bind()</tt> and <tt>PR_Listen()</tt>.

    In blocking mode, any of these potentially-blocking functions requires the use of the NT I/O completion port. So at that point we must determine whether to associate the socket with the I/O completion or not, and that decision cannot be changed later.

    There is a second constraint, due to the use of NT asynchronous I/O and the recycling of used sockets:

    The new socket returned by <tt>PR_Accept()</tt> or <tt>PR_AcceptRead()</tt> inherits the blocking/nonblocking io mode of the listening socket and this cannot be changed.

    The socket returned by <tt>PR_Accept()</tt> or <tt>PR_AcceptRead()</tt> on a blocking, listening socket may be a recycled socket previously used in a <tt>PR_TransmitFile()</tt> call. Since <tt>PR_TransmitFile()</tt> only operates in blocking mode, this recycled socket can only be reused in blocking mode, hence the above constraint.

    Because these constraints only apply to NT, it is advised that you test your cross-platform code that uses nonblocking io on NT early in the development cycle. These constraints are enforced in the debug NSPR library by assertions.

    Differences from Blocking IO

    • In nonblocking mode, the timeout argument for the io functions is ignored.
    • <tt>PR_AcceptRead()</tt> and <tt>PR_TransmitFile()</tt> only work on blocking sockets. They do not make sense in nonblocking mode.
    • <tt>PR_Write()</tt>, <tt>PR_Send()</tt>, <tt>PR_Writev()</tt> in blocking mode block until the entire buffer is sent. In nonblocking mode, they cannot block, so they may return with just sending part of the buffer.

    PR_Poll() or PR_Select()?

    <tt>PR_Select()</tt> is deprecated, now declared in <tt>private/pprio.h</tt>. Use <tt>PR_Poll()</tt> instead.

    The current implementation of <tt>PR_Select()</tt> simply calls <tt>PR_Poll()</tt>, so it is sure to have worse performance. Also, native file descriptors (socket handles) cannot be added to <tt>PR_fd_set</tt>, i.e., the functions <tt>PR_FD_NSET</tt>, <tt>PR_FD_NCLR</tt>, <tt>PR_FD_NISSET</tt> do not work.

    PR_Available()

    When <tt>PR_Available()</tt> returns 0, it may mean one of two things:

    • There is no data available for reading on that socket. I.e., <tt>PR_Recv()</tt> would block (a blocking socket) or fail with <tt>PR_WOULD_BLOCK_ERROR</tt> (a nonblocking socket).
    • The TCP connection on that socket has been closed (end of stream).

    These two cases can be distinguished by <tt>PR_Poll()</tt>. If <tt>PR_Poll()</tt> reports that the socket is readable (i.e., <tt>PR_POLL_READ</tt> is set in <tt>out_flags</tt>), and <tt>PR_Available()</tt> returns 0, this means that the socket connection is closed.

    Current Status

    Implemented across all supported platforms.

    Original Document Information

    • Author: Wan-Teh Chang
    • Last Updated Date: October 30, 1997

    Document Tags and Contributors

    タグ:
    Contributors to this page: Pd
    最終更新者: Pd,