History of background-repeat Revision history for: English (US) Oct 11, 2014 2:52:49 PM chrisAnderson Review finished. Previous Oct 11, 2014 2:49:52 PM chrisAnderson The sentence ending in a colon didn't seem directly tied to the explanations below. Previous Oct 11, 2014 12:46:48 PM chrisAnderson changed the example to an ordered list, because it uses numbers, and has order. "HTML content" -> "HTML". Content is redundant. Previous Oct 10, 2014 4:55:35 PM chrisAnderson Changed one value table to use table headers: removed 'is the equivalent of' repeated on every row Previous Oct 9, 2014 10:34:28 PM chrisAnderson cleaning up, and technical correction: looks like to me background position applies when there is only one image. Clarity and an example added to round. Previous Oct 9, 2014 5:40:27 PM chrisAnderson removing extra spans/p tag Previous Oct 9, 2014 5:38:20 PM chrisAnderson Decreasing wordiness for the space description. Previous Oct 8, 2014 10:13:45 PM chrisAnderson Same idea, simpler sentence. Also, it WILL be clipped. No chance of that not happening. Also removed "in the given direction" because you don't explicitly state a direction. The axis is determined by how you use that value in the syntax. Previous Oct 8, 2014 10:09:03 PM chrisAnderson "Following" isn't really the right word. Also removed a typo and fixed spacing between the example boxes and the text above them. Previous Oct 8, 2014 9:59:31 PM chrisAnderson "CSS gets overridden" seems like general CSS, not background-repeat. Logic of the paragraph seems bizarre - if it isn't set with background after background-repeat, then it is reset by some shorthand property. What shorthand property? What initial value?