Operators

  • Revision slug: Talk:JavaScript/Guide/Obsolete_Pages/Operators
  • Revision title: Operators
  • Revision id: 201381
  • Created:
  • Creator: Exaton
  • Is current revision? No
  • Comment /* Precedence Table */ RE: Reference equivalent

Revision Content

Precedence Table

Hi. I was under the impression that it was more customary, in a precedence table, to list operators in decreasing order of precendence -- ie. the higher up in the table, the greater priority. I cite this table concerning C and C++ in Wikipedia as an example, and I'm pretty sure it's what I've always seen in textbooks... Anyone else with an opinion concerning this ? (whoops, forgot to sign that, sorry) Exaton 09:07, 25 March 2006 (PST)

I have now seen that the Operator Precedence Table in the MDC JS Core Reference *is* reversed, and that it underwent that reversal after discussion on the talk page. So, shouldn't the same thing happen here ? Happy to do the copy & pasting if people agree :-) Exaton 00:38, 28 March 2006 (PST)

Revision Source

<h3 name="Precedence_Table"> Precedence Table </h3>
<p>Hi. I was under the impression that it was more customary, in a precedence table, to list operators in decreasing order of precendence -- ie. the higher up in the table, the greater priority. I cite <a class="external" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operators_in_C_and_C%2B%2B#Operator_precedence">this table concerning C and C++</a> in Wikipedia as an example, and I'm pretty sure it's what I've always seen in textbooks... Anyone else with an opinion concerning this ? <i>(whoops, forgot to sign that, sorry)</i> <a href="User:Exaton">Exaton</a> 09:07, 25 March 2006 (PST)
</p><p>I have now seen that the <a href="en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Reference/Operators/Operator_Precedence">Operator Precedence Table in the MDC JS Core Reference</a> *is* reversed, and that it underwent that reversal after discussion on the talk page. So, shouldn't the same thing happen here ? Happy to do the copy &amp; pasting if people agree :-) <a href="User:Exaton">Exaton</a> 00:38, 28 March 2006 (PST)
</p>
Revert to this revision