document.loadOverlay

The phrase about observer being optional came straight from the IDL actually. --Nickolay 08:47, 30 November 2005 (PST)

I actually noticed this when patching a small crasher in loadOverlay, tho it happened after I submitted the changes here. The "optional" part's definitely wrong, tho (testcase). I'm not even sure that you can have optional parameters in XPCOM. --Waldo 13:23, 30 November 2005 (PST)

Optional in the sense that null may be passed.
I remember a bug that was caused by the fact that current implementation doesn't deal well with null observers, and agree with your edit; just had to mention that IDL says otherwise. --Nickolay 14:04, 30 November 2005 (PST)

I think that an example of relying on observers to run subsequent overlays would be in place in this article. Could you please add it? q0k 05 January 2010

Document Tags and Contributors

Contributors to this page: q0k, Nickolay, Waldo
Last updated by: q0k,