User talk:Charles

Please note, a "tag" is not the same as an "element" in html or rss, please do not make this mistake any more than you already have, and please try and correct pages you have made this mistake with already;

Also I personally feel that the Template:HTML is badly named (perhaps Template:HTML:element_nav or some such) but also horrendous for "discoverability" of what each link is actually linking to, especially in printed documents, where a person may wish to have the url omited, or simply have the url-appended just after the anchor (CSS of (similar to) "a:link::after { content: ' (' + attr(href) + ')'; ) could be problematic to say the least. --Callek 22:07, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)

Thank you for heeding my advice on element vs tag; I do have one other comment though, to me (I am unsure if this is official definition or not) an element name does not include the < and > portions, and therefore does not make much sense to me to include them in the index/description of the element. (in examples, sure but no need in an index of the elements). Secondly the RSS Entity List, well I'm not sure how to better do it, though your methodology seems a bit -- odd. Thanks overall for your efforts though! --Callek 22:49, 29 Jul 2005 (PDT)

See: User_talk:Charles:Licensing and User_talk:Charles:I_MADE_THAT and on that note, I *think* Licensing is spelled wrong, (not that it makes _that_ much of a difference. --Callek 00:04, 31 Jul 2005 (PDT)